Early medical menopause raised heart risk — but the mortality excess stopped at age 45
A meta-analysis of 36 studies and 2.6 million women found iatrogenic menopause raised stroke and cardiovascular risk. The death-rate excess was confined to menopause before 45, with null estimates after.
| Group | Value (value) |
|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | 1.08 (1.01 to 1.16) |
| Cardiovascular events | 1.25 (1.12 to 1.39) |
| Coronary heart disease | 1.48 (1.07 to 2.03) |
| Stroke | 1.22 (1.15 to 1.28) |
Iatrogenic menopause — menopause brought on early by surgery, radiation or drug treatment rather than by age — is common, and it removes the body's own oestrogen years ahead of schedule. Its long-term consequences for the heart have been assumed more than measured, and in particular it has been unclear whether the age at which it happens changes the risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in JAMA Network Open on October 2 tried to pin both questions down, and the answer it gives on age is the more useful half [s1].
What was pooled
The authors searched seven databases — Scopus, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register, CINAHL and PsycINFO — from January 2004 to March 2026, for observational studies and randomised trials reporting cardiovascular outcomes in women with iatrogenic menopause before the natural menopausal age, compared with naturally menopausal or age-matched women [s1].
From 14,409 records they included 36 studies covering 2,617,942 women [s1]. The iatrogenic-menopause group had a mean age of 55.52 years and the comparators 45.58 years; median follow-up was 16.0 years, ranging from 4.8 to 36.0 years across studies [s1]. Results were combined as random-effects pooled hazard ratios, with age at menopause carried through as a moderator [s1].
The overall associations
Against comparators, iatrogenic menopause was associated with higher risks across the board: all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16), cardiovascular events (1.25, 1.12-1.39), coronary heart disease (1.48, 1.07-2.03) and stroke (1.22, 1.15-1.28) [s1]. Stroke was the most consistent signal [s1].
Taken alone, those numbers read as a uniform hazard. The age analysis shows they are not.
Where the age cut-off bites
The excess in mortality was not spread evenly. It was confined to women whose iatrogenic menopause occurred before age 45 — cardiovascular mortality pooled hazard ratio 1.20 (95% CI 1.04-1.37) and all-cause mortality 1.15 (1.06-1.25) in that group [s1]. For women whose iatrogenic menopause came at or after 45, the estimates were null: cardiovascular mortality 0.95 (0.81-1.11) and all-cause mortality 0.99 (0.89-1.09) [s1].
A post-hoc meta-regression put a slope on that pattern. Each additional five years of age at iatrogenic menopause was associated with a lower risk on the composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.97), drawn from 37 estimates across 11 independent populations [s1]. The authors read this as a period of elevated risk before age 45, rather than a single cliff-edge threshold [s1].
That distinction is the practical point. The headline "iatrogenic menopause raises cardiovascular risk" is true but incomplete; the risk that matters for mortality is loaded onto the women who lose ovarian function earliest, and thins out as the age at menopause rises toward the natural range.
The limits
This is a meta-analysis of mostly observational studies, and it inherits their weaknesses [s1]. Women who undergo early oophorectomy or cancer-related treatment differ from comparators in ways beyond menopausal age — the underlying disease, the treatment itself, and whether they received hormone therapy afterward, which the pooled estimates cannot fully separate. The comparators were on average nearly a decade younger than the iatrogenic group, a mismatch the age-stratified analysis mitigates but does not erase [s1].
Heterogeneity across 36 studies spanning more than two decades of follow-up is also substantial, and pooled hazard ratios smooth over real differences in how menopause was defined and how outcomes were captured [s1]. These are associations, not proof that early menopause itself causes the excess.
The direction, though, is consistent with earlier cohort work. A UK Biobank study of 144,260 postmenopausal women reported higher incident cardiovascular disease in those with natural or surgical menopause before age 40 [s2], the youngest and highest-risk end of the same gradient this meta-analysis describes.
What to watch
Whether trials of hormone therapy after early iatrogenic menopause show the mortality excess is modifiable; whether the under-45 threshold holds in individual-patient-data analyses; and whether guideline bodies fold an age gradient, rather than a single cut-off, into how they counsel women facing early surgical or medical menopause.
This article describes a meta-analysis of observational studies and is informational only. It is not medical advice.
Sources
- [s1] Age at Iatrogenic Menopause and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality, JAMA Network Open, 2026;9:e2637545, published online 2026-10-02. PMID 42826016.
- [s2] Association of Premature Natural and Surgical Menopause With Incident Cardiovascular Disease, JAMA, 2019;322(24):2411-2421, published 2019-12-24. PMID 31738818.
Sources
- Age at Iatrogenic Menopause and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality — JAMA Network Open, 2026;9:e2637545 , October 2, 2026
- Association of Premature Natural and Surgical Menopause With Incident Cardiovascular Disease — JAMA, 2019;322(24):2411-2421 , December 24, 2019
More on
NCDs caused 4.7 million deaths in Africa in 2023, new GBD analysis finds
The Global Burden of Disease 2023 study estimates 2.33 billion NCD incident cases and 263 million DALYs across Africa, with high blood pressure the single largest driver of the continent's NCD deaths.
Does a daily aspirin prevent a first heart attack? Three 2018 trials say rarely
In people with no heart disease, aspirin's benefit was small or absent and bleeding rose across three large trials. US guidance now advises against starting it at 60 or older.
Is olive oil good for your heart? A trial and two big cohorts point the same way
A Mediterranean diet rich in extra-virgin olive oil cut cardiovascular events in a Spanish trial, and US cohorts link over half a tablespoon a day to less heart disease — the biggest signal in what it replaces.
The Mediterranean diet's landmark trial was retracted, then republished
Spain's PREDIMED trial is the strongest randomised evidence that a dietary pattern lowers cardiovascular events. In 2018 its authors withdrew it over flawed randomisation and reissued corrected results.