WHAT THE STUDY ACTUALLY SAYSLinking exome data to electronic medical records solved 15% of unexplained hearing-loss cases and flagged new candidate genes — while showing what the records could not supply.
3 min read
EXPLAINEROSHA and NIOSH use different rules for how fast allowable exposure falls as sound gets louder. WHO's venue standard permits an average of 100 decibels. The headline 'one billion at risk' figure is a modelled range.
5 min read
WHAT THE STUDY ACTUALLY SAYSA decade of eardrum repair delivered on Country across nine Queensland communities produced closure rates below metropolitan benchmarks — and a follow-up rate most urban surgical services do not achieve.
4 min read
EXPLAINERIt found no meaningful difference at six weeks. It enrolled 64 people, tested one device, and ran for six weeks. That is the entire head-to-head evidence base three years after the category opened.
4 min read
WHAT THE STUDY ACTUALLY SAYSACHIEVE randomised 977 older adults and measured three-year cognitive change. The difference between hearing aids and health education was 0.002 SD units, p=0.96. One subgroup result is doing a lot of work.
4 min read
EXPLAINERA standing commission estimates that eliminating 14 risk factors could prevent or delay 45% of dementia across a whole population. What that number means for one person is a different and much weaker claim.
4 min read
This page indexes this newspaper’s reporting on Hearing Loss. It is not a medical reference entry, and nothing here is medical advice. See our editorial standards.