EVIDENCE

What actually helps balance as you age — and why a 10-second test predicts survival

Balance starts slipping after the mid-50s. In 1,702 adults, those who could not hold a 10-second one-legged stance had 84% higher death risk. Specific exercise, done three times a week, measurably restores it.

Deaths during a median 7-year follow-up, by 10-second one-legged stance resultCompleted the stance: 4.6%; Could not complete it: 17.5%0%10%20%Completed the stance4.6%Could not complete it17.5%
Deaths during a median 7-year follow-up, by 10-second one-legged stance result
GroupValue (%)
Completed the stance4.6
Could not complete it17.5
Deaths during a median 7-year follow-up, by 10-second one-legged stance result 1,702 adults aged 51-75; percentage who died among those able versus unable to complete the test. Source: British Journal of Sports Medicine

Balance is not fixed. It declines with age — noticeably from the mid-50s — and that decline raises the risk of falls and other serious outcomes [s1]. The reassuring half of the story is that balance responds to training: specific kinds of exercise measurably improve it, even late in life [s2]. So the honest answer to "what helps balance as you age" is that targeted practice does, and there is a simple test that shows why it is worth the effort.

Why balance is worth measuring

A study of 1,702 adults aged 51 to 75 asked a plain question: can you stand on one leg for 10 seconds [s1]? Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 7.2% of the group died [s1]. Among those who could complete the 10-second one-legged stance, 4.6% died; among those who could not, 17.5% did [s1]. After adjusting for age, sex, body-mass index and other illnesses, the inability to hold the stance was linked to an 84% higher risk of death (hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.78) [s1].

This does not mean wobbling on one foot causes an early death. Balance is a mirror, not a dial: it reflects the state of your muscles, joints, inner ear, vision and nervous system all at once, which is why a failed stance flags underlying frailty. Roughly one in five of the group — 20.4%, of whom 68% were men — could not complete it [s1]. Adding the test to the standard set of risk factors measurably improved the prediction of who would die [s1], and the researchers argued it is worth including in a routine check-up precisely because it captures so much in 10 seconds. The value lies less in the number than in what a sudden inability to hold it reveals about the systems that keep you upright.

What the trials show actually improves balance

The most complete answer comes from a Cochrane review that pooled 94 randomised trials with 9,917 participants aged 60 and over [s2]. It sorted exercise into categories and reported which produced measurable gains on standard balance tests — the Timed Up & Go, walking speed, the Berg Balance Scale, and how long a person can stand on one leg [s2].

Several approaches worked. Programmes built around gait, balance, co-ordination and functional tasks improved the Berg Balance Scale by a mean of 3.48 points, cut Timed Up & Go time by 0.82 seconds, and raised walking speed [s2]. Strengthening exercise — resistance or power training — cut Timed Up & Go by 4.30 seconds and lengthened eyes-closed single-leg standing by 1.64 seconds [s2]. So-called 3D exercise, which includes Tai Chi, dance and yoga, lengthened eyes-open single-leg standing by 9.60 seconds in one trial [s2]. Programmes combining several types improved single-leg standing by 5.03 seconds [s2]. The Timed Up & Go — the seconds it takes to rise from a chair, walk three metres, turn and sit — is not an abstract score: it is a close proxy for the everyday manoeuvres where older people actually lose their footing, so shaving seconds off it maps onto real-world steadiness.

Two findings matter for anyone deciding what to do. First, the effective programmes shared a recipe: they "ran three times a week for three months and involved dynamic exercise in standing" [s2] — that is, moving and shifting weight on your feet, not sitting. Second, the reviewers rated the overall evidence as weak and the effects as moderate, and found no clear benefit from walking or cycling alone, from computerised balance games, or from vibration plates [s2]. General activity is good for you, but it is not the same as balance training.

How to read this

If you want better balance, the evidence points to deliberate practice that challenges you while standing — heel-to-toe walking, standing on one leg, weight shifts, Tai Chi — combined with leg-strengthening work, done a few times a week over months rather than days [s2]. Few adverse events were reported in the trials, so these are generally safe [s2]. The gains are real but not dramatic, and they fade if you stop, so this is maintenance, not a one-off fix.

What to watch

The one-legged stance is a screening cue, not a diagnosis. See a doctor promptly if your balance has changed suddenly, if you are having unexplained falls, or if unsteadiness comes with dizziness, weakness, numbness, vision changes or new confusion — these can signal inner-ear, heart, neurological or medication problems that need assessing rather than exercising away. Anyone who is already frail or has fallen should build a balance routine with a physiotherapist, who can pitch the difficulty safely.

Sources

  1. Successful 10-second one-legged stance performance predicts survival in middle-aged and older individuals — British Journal of Sports Medicine , June 21, 2022
  2. Exercise for improving balance in older people — Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , November 9, 2011
Related coverage